ElevenLex · Case Digests
Training compensation & solidarity at CAS
From Bayern v. Alianza Lima and the Pyunik line to the Clearing House era: how CAS prices the development of players — training compensation, solidarity mechanism, and their waivers.
No digests match your search. LexXi can still research it — ask across the full 14,200-document corpus.
- CAS 2008/A/1568"M. & FC Wil 1900 v. FIFA & Naftex"2008 M. & Football Club Wil 1900 v. FIFA & Club PFC Naftex AC Bourgas CAS stayed FIFA DRC disciplinary sanctions against a player and club pending appeal, finding irreparable harm. Read the digest →
- CAS 2007/A/1358"FC Pyunik Yerevan v. L."2008 FC Pyunik Yerevan v. L., AFC Rapid Bucaresti & FIFA CAS increased compensation for mid-contract departure to USD 25,000 but declined to impose sporting sanctions on player or new club. Read the digest →
- CAS 2007/A/1359"FC Pyunik Yerevan"2008 FC Pyunik Yerevan v. E., AFC Rapid Bucaresti & FIFA CAS increased compensation for a player's mid-Protected Period contract breach from USD 15,000 to USD 60,000, rejecting mandatory sporting sanctions. Read the digest →
- CAS 2003/O/506"Bayern Munchen v. Alianza Lima"2004 FC Bayern Munchen AG v. Club Alianza Lima CAS set aside the DRC's EUR 225,000 award and fixed training compensation at EUR 210,000 for Paolo Guerrero's transfer to Bayern Munich. Read the digest →
- CAS 2004/A/691"Barcelona v. Manchester United (Piqué)"2005 FC Barcelona SAD v. Manchester United FC CAS held FIFA contractual-stability rules do not apply to amateur players, dismissing Barcelona's appeal over Gerard Piqué's move to Manchester United. Read the digest →
- CAS 2010/A/2098"Sevilla v. Lens (Seydou Keita)"2010 Sevilla FC v. RC Lens A player's statutory termination of his contract under Spanish law, funded by his new club, does not trigger a sell-on clause requiring payment to the selling… Read the digest →
- CAS 2006/A/1018"River Plate v. Hamburger"2006 C.A. River Plate v. Hamburger S.V. A 'without any deduction' clause in a transfer agreement shifts the solidarity contribution burden from the selling club to the buying club. Read the digest →
- CAS 2018/A/5888"Uruguayan Clubs v. FIFA (AUF Normalisation Committee)"2019 Centro Atlético Fénix, Club Atlético Boston River, Club Atlético Cerro, Club Atlético Progreso, Club Atlético River Plate, Danubio Fútbol Club, Defensor Sporting Club, Liverpool Fútbol Club, Cerro Largo FC, Central Español Fútbol Club, Club Atlético Villa Teresa, Racing Club de Montevideo, Club Sportivo Miramar Misiones, Montevideo Wanderers F.C., Club Atlético Juventud v. Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) & Confederación Sudamericana de Fútbol (CONMEBOL) & Asociación Uruguaya de Fútbol (AUF) CAS upheld FIFA's appointment of a normalisation committee for the AUF, finding exceptional circumstances under Art. 8(2) FIFA Statutes justified the… Read the digest →
- CAS 2021/A/8078"Huddersfield v. Espanyol"2022 Huddersfield Town Association Football Club Limited v. Reial Club Deportiu Espanyol de Barcelona & Fédération Internationale de Football Association CAS upheld FIFA's disciplinary sanction against Huddersfield for failing to timely reject a binding training-compensation proposal under Article 13 FIFA… Read the digest →
- CAS 2019/A/6096"Lugano v. Inter (Koffi training compensation)"2019 FC Lugano SA v. FC Internazionale Milano S.p.A. CAS confirmed EUR 235,000 training compensation owed by Lugano to Inter, holding that a loan does not break the training compensation chain. Read the digest →
- CAS 2017/A/5277"FK Sarajevo v. Westerlo"2018 FK Sarajevo v. KVC Westerlo CAS upheld FK Sarajevo's conditional written waiver of training compensation as valid and binding, dismissing its EUR 279,166.67 claim. Read the digest →
- CAS 2025/A/11117"Sporting Club Accra"2025 Sporting Club Accra v. Leicester City FC & FIFA CAS dismissed Ghanaian academy's training compensation claim after it failed to challenge the FIFA Electronic Player Passport within prescribed deadlines. Read the digest →
- CAS 2024/A/10949"Rayo Majadahonda v. FIFA (Voloshyn)"2024 C.F. Rayo Majadahonda S.A.D. v. MEE DSSC DRC Dnipro & DIUSC Inter Dnipro & DIUSSH Novomoskovsk & Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) CAS dismissed Rayo Majadahonda's appeal, confirming EUR 32,904.10 training compensation was owed to three Ukrainian clubs for player Illia Voloshyn. Read the digest →
Each digest is generated by LexXi from the full award text and machine-verified against it. For research across 14,200+ FIFA & CAS documents with verified citations, create a free account.